| Introduction Citizenship
education is of primary importance to the construction of the sense of belonging and to
civic participation in Canadian society. Although much has been said and written about
citizenship education, there is no body of systematic long-term research in this key area.
Building upon previous established exchanges among some researchers and policy makers, the
project was to develop an agenda for research on citizenship education in Canada, in an
intensive three day think tank bringing together researchers, practitioners, policy makers
and stakeholders interested in citizenship education. The resulting agenda is expected to
provide direction and substance towards the development of a national capacity for
research in citizenship education of interest to all concerned.
The Citizenship Education Think Tank, held on March 27-30, 1998, at the Kananaskis
Field Station of the University of Calgary, was a historic event for not since 1919, has a
group of concerned Canadians come together to discuss citizenship education. At that time,
a conference was held, organized by business interests, in the wake of the Winnipeg Strike
of 1915, to consider the development of a stable and productive citizenry.
Objectives of the Citizenship Education
Think Tank
Almost eighty years later, the ThinkTank project had as its purpose to assure the
development of a national capacity for citizenship education research (1) by developing an
agenda for citizenship education research in Canada; (2) by continuing the exchange among
interested researchers, partners and stakeholders, begun at the Second National Metropolis
Conference in November 1997; and (3) by laying the groundwork for comparative national
research as well as pan-Canadian common research projects.
This project is expected to assist in the development of strategies to facilitate full
and active participation of diverse communities in Canadian society; in encouraging and
assisting the development of inclusive policies, programs and practices of public
institutions and federal departments/agencies; as well as increasing public awareness,
understanding and informed public dialogue about multiculturalism, racism and cultural
diversity in Canada.
The objectives of the Citizenship Education Think Tank may be viewed within the context
of the federal Multiculturalism Policy, first established in 1971, which encourages
participation by all citizens in building and shaping Canada through support of three
fundamental goals - identity, civic participation and social justice.
The support of the department may also be considered in light of current policy
research interests, shared among several federal departments, regarding social cohesion.
Among identified research issues are civic education, changing values, national identity
and community attachment.
Four Research Themes
As a result of discussions which focussed on documents exchanged, participants'
interests and experiences, as well as what research is needed to guide action in this
domain, four research themes emerged:
1. Citizenship Conceptions and Contexts;
2. Citizenship Practices;
3. Citizenship Values; and
4. Citizenship Skills, Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours.
For each theme, research programmes were elaborated, with each developed into a series
of prioritized research projects, responsibilities assumed or assigned, research designs
sketched out, budgets estimated and possible interested stakeholders identified.
Citizenship Conceptions and Contexts
The theme dealing with the Conceptions and Contexts of Citizenship Education was
conceptualized as stemming from a tradition of inquiry and research and as consisting of
four sets of research projects: one on historical, social and philosophical contexts,
another on people's conceptions of citizenship, and the third one on educators'
conceptions.
The first set on contexts consists of four studies dealing with a) the development of a
conceptual framework; b) implications of this framework for Citizenship Education; c) the
historical and philosophical background of Citizenship Education; and d) multiple
citizenship.
The next set of projects dealing with people's conceptions of citizenship, would study
a) 17 and 18 year olds' conception of citizenship, then b) extend this nationally and
internationally; c) children and young people's conception of citizenship, then agan d)
extend this nationally; e) adolescents' understanding of rights; f) identity and language;
g) immigrant conceptions of citizenship as a pilot study; and finally h) a study of
people's representation of rights.
The third set of projects, dealing with educators' conceptions of citizenship, includes
five studies: a) educators' view of global citizenship; b) representation of citizenship
conceptions of pre-service teachers, c) with national extension; then, d) with teachers;
and e) teacher attitudes toward diversity.
Table 1: CONCEPTIONS: HISTORICAL, SOCIAL, PHILOSOPHICAL, CONTEXT |
Study |
Researchers |
Time |
Development of
Conceptual framework |
To be determined |
Summer 98' |
Implication of
framework (possibility) of citizenship education |
Alan Sears |
Fall 98' - Spring
99' |
Historical/
Philosophical paper; Anglo conformity and multinational citizenship emphasis on paradigm
shifts |
R. Bruno-Jofre
R. Magsino |
Fall 98' - Spring
99' |
Multiple
citizenship - conceptual paper;
material development and testing;
evaluation |
G. Pike |
Fall 98' - 2001
Conceptual paper by spring 1999 |
Table 2: PEOPLES' CONCEPTIONS OF
CITIZENSHIP |
Study |
Researchers |
Time |
Montréal's study
on the 17 &18 year olds conception of citizenship education |
M. Pagé |
1997 - 2000 |
Extend study
nationally and internationally |
M. Pagé |
1998 - 2000 |
Children's and
Young peoples conception of citizenship |
Sears, Hughes
& Clarke |
1997 - 2000 |
Extend Nationally |
Sears, Hughes,
Clarke et al |
1998 - 2001 |
Adolescents
understanding of rights |
C. Ungerleider |
Fall 1998 |
Identity and
Language |
Y. Hébert |
1998 - 2001 |
Immigrant
conception of citizenship: A Pilot |
M. Siemiatycki |
1998 - 1999 |
Representation of
rights |
M. Lavallée |
1998 - 1999 |
Table 3. EDUCATORS'
CONCEPTIONS |
Study |
Researchers |
Time |
Educators views
of global citizenship |
G. Pike |
F1998-Jan 1999 |
Representation of
cit. conceptions of pre-service teachers at 4 Que. and 1 N.B. Universities |
F. Desroches |
F 1998-Jan 1999 |
Replication at
Anglo University |
Sears, Orr,
Ungerleider, Krugly-Smolska, Cassidy, Hébert... |
?? |
Replication of
surveys with teachers |
Hughes/Sears,
Ungerleider, Pagé |
1999-? |
Teacher attitudes
toward diversity |
Hohl & Pagé |
|
Citizenship Practices
The theme dealing with Practices of Citizenship Education examines four research
questions:
1) What is the state of knowledge on what citizenship education is actually being done
(policies, programmes, material, practices)?
2) What is the impact of practices and norms of institutions other than school
institutions on citizenship education, especially on the hidden curriculum? What implicit
conceptions do these institutions convey regarding notions such as equality/equity,
individual/group, minority/majority, etc?
3) What role do schools and other institutions play for groups such as students,
parents, community groups, etc, if it is considered that these institutions are social
spaces where different conceptions and practices of citizenship meet?
4) What does the notion of "best practices" of citizenship mean? How can
these be identified? On the basis of what criteria? How can they be evaluated? And this,
in different sectors.
Table
4. CITIZENSHIP PRACTICES |
Study |
Topic |
Researchers |
Time |
One |
Teacher
Pre-Service Education
-at Queen's
-nationally |
Krugly-Smolska |
April-May 1998 |
One |
Citizenship
Education of Adult Immigrants comparing Québec and the rest of Canada |
Derwing &
McAndrew |
Sept 1998 - |
One |
Comparative Study
on Children's Understanding of Curriculum Concepts of Citizenship, Pan-Canadian |
Sears &
Hughes et al |
? |
One |
Teachers'
Implementation of Citizenship Education Programs |
Smits, Orr,
Beardsley, Cassidy |
Spring 1999 |
Two |
Practices of
Citizenship in the Classroom and in the School |
Orr, Smits,
Toohey, Hohl |
Underway |
Three |
Schools as a
Contested Sites for Citizenship |
McAndrew - a
reflection paper as first step |
Fall 1998 |
Four |
Best Practices |
Smits -
reflection paper as first step |
Summer 1998 |
The research programme for this theme includes four sets of research projects, one of
which is extensive. A first sub-theme looks at teacher preparation and curriculum, with
four research projects: a) teacher preparation; b) a comparison of adult immigrant
citizenship curriculum, comparing Québec with the rest of Canada; c) the extension of the
on-going research project on children's understanding of curriculum concepts of
citizenship on a pan-Canadian basis; d) a study of contested sites; and d) a study of
teachers' implementation of existing citizenship materials and programs. The next
sub-theme would examine classroom and school practices of citizenship. A third one would
then study schools as contested sites where different conceptions of citizenship meet. A
final study would examine best practices of citizenship education.
Citizenship Values and Principles
Four priorities are central to the theme of Citizenship Values and Principles:
- to determine the citizenship values and principles which Canadians share;
- to determine Canadian's perceptions of the values held by particular groups within
Canadian society;
- to determine what Canadians do when confronted with situations to which their values
apply and in which their values conflict; and
- to determine whether available citizenship materials reflect the citizenship values to
which Canadians subscribe.
The research programme for this theme, Citizenship Values and
Principles, consists of five research phases. Phase One consists of a thorough review
of the literature on citizenship and values Canadians share, looking at the academic
literature, the policy context and polling studies. Phase Two intends to determine the
citizenship values and principles which Canadians by surveying children, adolescents and
adults, in three separate studies. Phase Three aims to determine Canadians' perceptions of
the values held by particular groups where as Phase Four will determine what Canadians do
when confronted with situations in which their values apply and in which their values
conflict. Phase Five will then determine whether available citizenship materials reflect
the values to which Canadians subscribe.
Canadian
Citizenship Values and Principles Project |
Phase |
Person Responsible for
Directing Phase |
Proposed Timeline |
Phase One
Review of Literature on Citizenship and
Values Canadians Share
-academic
-policy context
-polling studies |
Ungerleider,
Hébert, Wilkinson
Jeff Bullard, John Biles
|
09/98-04/99
finished
|
Phase Two
To determine the citizenship values and
principles which Canadians share
a) survey children
b) survey adolescents
c) survey adults |
A. Sears & A.
Hughes
Charles Ungerleider
|
09/98-04/99
09/98-04/99 |
Phase Three
To determine Canadians' perceptions of the
values held by particular groups |
Charles
Ungerleider
TBA |
|
Phase Four
To determine what Canadians do when
confronted with situations:
a) to which their values apply;
b) to which their values conflict; |
Lori Wilkinson
Lori Wilkinson |
09/99-08/00
09/00-08/00 |
Phase Five
To determine whether available citizenship
materials reflect the values to which Canadians subscribe |
Yvonne Hébert
John Kabano |
09/00-08-01 |
Citizenship Behaviours, Attitudes,
Skills and Knowledge
Looking at citizen efficacy, the fourth theme on the behaviours, attitudes, skills
and knowledge (BASK) particular to citizenship will examine four questions:
1) What are the behaviours, attitudes, skills and knowledge not only among students,
but also among citizens in general, in the domain of citizenship?
2) Although it is very difficult to define these, how can such research guide the
implementation of "good citizen practices"?
3) How do skills, attitudes and knowledge of citizenship guide behaviour?
4) What influence do pedagogical approaches have in the transmission and acquisition of
citizenship concepts? In other words, how can a sense of efficacy be developed so that
students are confident that they can as citizens contribute to the evolution of society?
A first priority is the development of a data bank pertaining to the behaviours,
attitudes, skills, and knowledge of students and of the public. A first research project
would define indicators of the behaviours, attitudes, skills, and knowledge of citizenship
in terms of citizen efficacy. Next is the establishment of links between skills,
attitudes, knowledge, and civic participation, as these flow from the definition of
citizen efficacy. Here, a second research project would study 13-16 year olds in schools
as well as young adults and newcomers, with a questionnaire, linking it to an
international study (IEA). An examination of situational and contextual factors that
influence the development of individuals notable for their considerable civic
participation are a third priority. This part of the overall research agenda would occur
in two phases, a first one that operationalizes valid indicators of citizenship, based
upon a literature review, then move to collect data on a national level in both school and
non-school instances, looking particularly at nurturing citizenship, its influences in
community, media and family; and replication of nuturing talents. Following the
preliminary analysis of this data, a second phase would consist of an examination of
existing links between attitudes, knowledge, skills and behaviours in terms of citizen
efficacy; here a study would be undertaken on students' perceptions of the "good
citizen".
Action Plan for Research Projects and
Dissemination of Results
Following upon the definition of the objectives, priorities and strategies for a
research agenda on citizenship education in Canada, accomplished at the Think Tank, the
remainder of the issues to consider deal with its implementation, communication and
evaluation of the agenda. An implementation plan would seek to build momentum and
credibility with the endorsement of major stakeholders and funders whereas a communication
strategy or set of strategies would assist in maintaing the cohesion of the research
network or community in terms of data sharing, groups discussions, link with stakeholders,
and dissemination of information. Finally, an evaluation plan is necessary to find out if
the national research agenda is a success, what measures can be put in place to review the
accomplishments and make adjustments as necessary. The implemention, communication and
evaluation plans would require financial support, in addition to the programme of research
identified presented earlier in this report.
These parts of the research agenda for citizenship education in Canada are carried over
to the next meeting of the network set for June 1, 1998 in Ottawa, the day after the
annual conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. Elisabeth Barot,
Canadian Commission of UNESCO, offers to host the meeting while Jeff Bullard offers to
take responsibility for inviting additional stakeholders in the afternoon for discussion
of further collaboration.
Participants
Elisabeth Barot
Canadian Commission for UNESCO |
Andy Hughes,
U New Brunswick |
Rick Beardsley,
British Columbia Teachers Federation |
John Kabano,
Université du Québec à Rimouski |
John Biles,
Multiculturalism Directorate, Canadian Heritage; and Metropolis Project |
Stacey Kaketsis,
U Calgary |
Jim Brackenbury,
Alberta Education; Council of Ministers of Education, Canada |
Eva Krugly-Smolska,
Queen's University |
Rosa Bruno-Jofre,
U Manitoba |
Marie McAndrew,
U Montréal |
Jeff Bullard,
Multiculturalism Directorate, Canadian Heritage |
Michèle Normand,
U Montréal |
Roger Butt,
International Comparative Research, Canadian Heritage |
Jeff Orr,
St. Francis Xavier U |
Wanda Cassidy,
Simon Fraser University |
Michel Pagé,
U Montréal |
Renée Delorme,
Canadian Identity and Cultural Development, Canadian Heritage |
Graham Pike,
OISE/U Toronto |
Tracey Derwing,
U Alberta |
Doug Ramsay,
Celebration Canada |
Fabienne Desroches,
U Montréal |
Alan Sears,
U New Brunswick |
Jim Frideres,
U Calgary |
Myer Siemiatycki,
Ryerson Polytechnic University |
Rudyard Griffith,
Dominion Institute |
Hans Smits,
U Regina |
Ingrid Hauck,
Policy, Education and Promotion, Citizenship and Immigration, Canada |
Caroline Tessier,
U Montréal |
Yvonne Hébert,
U Calgary |
Charles Ungerleider,
UBC |
|
Lori Wilkinson,
U Alberta |
|